Korkut, N. (2025). The role of public spaces in enhancing urban livability [Unpublished manuscript].
Studio NeoGe.
Public Spaces
In urban design literature, public space is recognized as a fundamental element shaping both the physical and social fabric of cities. Scholars such as Lynch (1960), Jacobs (1961), Habermas (1989), Carr et al. (1992), Cullen (1996), and Gehl (2001) emphasize that public spaces play a critical role in preserving, interpreting, and expressing the social and cultural dimensions of urban life. These spaces contribute significantly to the identity and meaning of the city. Additionally, researchers like Neils (2010) and Carmona (2010) have highlighted the inherent complexity of public space and its capacity to engage citizens in the design and use of the urban environment.
Public spaces are integral components of urban environments, characterized by their accessibility to all members of society, regardless of socioeconomic status, ethnicity, or background. They function as vital arenas for social interaction, recreation, and cultural expression, fostering a sense of community and belonging among residents. These spaces encompass a wide range of settings, including parks, plazas, streets, libraries, community centers, and waterfronts.
‘‘A Public space is a place for everyone. It is a place in which you do not have to know anyone or do anything in particular, except be there. Public places serve an important role as the most easily accessible places to meet people and to take part in public life’’ (Gehl, 1989, p.17).
The concept of public space can be traced back to ancient civilizations, where city squares, marketplaces, and amphitheaters served as central venues for social, political, and religious life (Carr et al., 1992). Throughout history, public spaces have continuously adapted to evolving social, cultural, and economic conditions, mirroring broader transformations in urbanization, governance, and urban design. In the medieval era, public squares and plazas became key focal points of civic life, hosting markets, festivals, and communal gatherings (Gehl & Svarre, 2013). The Industrial Revolution saw a growing emphasis on parks and green spaces as essential refuges from the dense and polluted urban fabric (Madanipour, 2003). In the contemporary period, public spaces have expanded in both form and function, encompassing pedestrian zones, waterfront promenades, public art installations, and community gardens, reflecting the increasingly diverse needs of urban populations.
Public spaces function as essential platforms for social interaction, fostering connections among individuals, communities, and cultures. They offer inclusive environments where people from diverse backgrounds can gather, share experiences, and cultivate relationships. As Gehl and Svarre (2013) describe, public spaces act as "the living rooms of the city," inviting residents to relax, socialize, and participate in everyday urban life. Parks, playgrounds, and sports facilities support physical activity and leisure, contributing to public health and overall well-being. Moreover, cultural events, festivals, and public performances held in these spaces celebrate the richness and diversity of urban communities, reinforcing social cohesion and a collective sense of identity.
The use and appropriation of public spaces is a fundamental issue that has to be considered in any study of the daily lives of city dwellers. However, it is an experience that is not the same for everyone, since age, sex, social class and ethnic identity affect the way urban life is lived and perceived (Garcia-Ramon et al., 2004).
In addition to their social and cultural significance, public spaces offer economic and environmental benefits that contribute to the vitality and sustainability of cities. Well-designed public spaces can attract visitors, stimulate economic activity, and enhance property values in surrounding areas (Carr et al., 1992). They also provide essential ecosystem services, such as carbon sequestration, air purification, and stormwater management, contributing to urban resilience and environmental quality. Green spaces, in particular, help mitigate the heat island effect, reduce air pollution, and provide habitats for biodiversity (Madanipour, 2003). By investing in public spaces, cities can improve the overall quality of life for residents, promote economic development, and mitigate the impacts of climate change.
Despite their numerous benefits, public spaces face various challenges in contemporary urban environments, including privatization, commercialization, and neglect. Many public spaces are underutilized, poorly maintained, or inaccessible to certain groups within the community, leading to social exclusion and inequity (Gehl & Svarre, 2013).
Addressing these challenges requires a holistic approach that considers the needs and preferences of diverse urban populations. Collaborative planning, community engagement, and participatory design processes can help ensure that public spaces are inclusive, accessible, and responsive to the needs of local residents (Carr et al., 1992). Additionally, innovative strategies such as tactical urbanism, pop-up parks, and placemaking initiatives can transform underutilized spaces into vibrant and dynamic public realms (Madanipour, 2003).
The Role of Public Spaces in Enhancing Urban Livability
Urban livability—commonly understood as the overall quality of life experienced by residents in urban settings—is influenced by a range of factors, including access to services and amenities, perceptions of safety, social cohesion, and environmental conditions. Within this context, public spaces play a pivotal role by offering environments that support recreation, foster social interaction, and enable cultural expression, thereby directly contributing to the vibrancy and well-being of urban life.
Great public spaces are those places where celebrations are held, social and economic exchanges occur, friends run into each other, and cultures mix. They are the “front porches” of our public institutions – libraries, field houses, schools – where we interact with each other and government. When these spaces work well, they serve as the stage for our public lives (Project for Public Spaces, 2008).
In evaluating thousands of public spaces around the world, PPS has found that to be successful, they generally share the following four qualities: they are accessible; people are engaged in activities there; the space is comfortable and has a good image; and finally, it is a sociable place: one where people meet each other and take people when they come to visit (Project for Public Spaces, 2008).
Whether a space is comfortable and presents itself well - has a good image - is key to its success. Comfort includes perceptions about safety, cleanliness, and the availability of places to sit - the importance of giving people the choice to sit where they want is generally underestimated (Project for Public Spaces, 2008).Activities are the basic building blocks of great places: They are the reasons why people visit in the first place, and why they continue to return. They are also what makes a place special or unique. When there is nothing to do in a place, it will sit empty and unused a sure sign something needs to change (Project for Public Spaces, 2008).
Defining of sociability is not easy part of the study. PPS (2018) defines; When people see friends, meet, and greet their neighbors, and feel comfortable interacting with strangers, they tend to feel a stronger sense of place or attachment to their community - and to the place that fosters these types of social activities.
To better understand how public spaces are used and how sociability emerges within them, Gehl (1987) offers a classification of activities into three categories: necessary, optional, and social. Necessary activities are those that are more or less obligatory, such as commuting to work or school, shopping, waiting for public transport, running errands, or delivering mail. These activities occur regardless of the quality of the urban environment, as they are essential parts of daily life. Optional activities refer to those undertaken by choice, contingent upon favorable conditions of time and place. These include leisure pursuits such as strolling, sitting, or engaging in outdoor hobbies—activities that people participate in only if the physical environment is inviting and accommodating.Social activities, on the other hand, are interactions that rely on the presence of others in public space. These range from informal encounters and conversations to communal gatherings and group play, and even include passive social engagement—simply observing and being among other people. Social activities include children at play, greetings and conversations, communal activities of various kinds, and finally – as the most widespread social activity – passive contacts, that is, simply seeing and hearing other people (Gehl,1987).
Gehl (1987) also emphasizes the critical role that the quality of outdoor environments plays in shaping public life. When the quality of a space is poor, only necessary activities tend to occur, as people move quickly through the area without lingering. In contrast, high-quality public spaces encourage people to extend their time outdoors—not only performing necessary activities at a slower pace, but also engaging in optional and social activities. In such environments, people feel invited to sit, eat, play, and interact, transforming the space into a vibrant setting for everyday urban life.
Public places serve as the social and cultural hubs of cities, offering residents opportunities for leisure, recreation, and community engagement. Parks, plazas, waterfronts, and pedestrian streets provide spaces for relaxation, exercise, and social interaction, contributing to the physical and mental well-being of urban residents (Gehl, 2010). Access to green spaces has been linked to improved health outcomes, reduced stress levels, and increased social cohesion, making parks and recreational areas essential components of livable cities (Kaczynski et al., 2008).
Furthermore, public places serve as venues for community events, festivals, and cultural activities that celebrate the diversity and vibrancy of urban life. Street markets, outdoor concerts, and art installations bring people together, fostering social connections and a sense of belonging among residents (Florida, 2005). These events contribute to the social capital of communities, strengthening bonds and fostering civic engagement (Putnam, 2000).
Public places also play a critical role in promoting sustainable transportation and active lifestyles. Pedestrian-friendly streets, bike lanes, and public transit nodes encourage walking, cycling, and the use of public transportation, reducing reliance on cars and mitigating traffic congestion and air pollution (Gehl, 2010). Additionally, mixed-use developments that integrate residential, commercial, and recreational spaces within walkable neighborhoods promote physical activity and reduce the need for long commutes, contributing to both individual and environmental health (Sallis et al., 2016).
The lively spaces send friendly and welcoming signals with the promise of social interaction. The presence of other people in itself signals which places are worthwhile. A theater with a full house and a theater that is nearly empty send two completely different messages. One signals anticipation of a common, enjoyable experience. The other signals that something is amiss (Gehl,2013). Gehl (2013),also suggests recreational and social activities to give a chance to individual to practice in urban life.
In an era of rapid urbanization and social transformation, the significance of public spaces in shaping livable cities has never been more critical. As this discussion has shown, well-designed and inclusive public spaces are not merely physical voids within the built environment—they are active, dynamic arenas where social life unfolds, cultural identities are expressed, and communities are formed. By enabling everyday interactions, supporting diverse activities, and promoting health, sustainability, and civic engagement, public spaces serve as foundational elements of urban livability.
To fully harness the potential of public spaces, cities must adopt holistic and people-centered planning approaches that prioritize accessibility, comfort, safety, and inclusivity. As Gehl, PPS, and others have emphasized, vibrant public spaces are those that invite people to participate—offering choice, fostering connection, and enhancing the everyday experience of urban life. Investing in such spaces is not only a matter of urban design but a commitment to social equity, environmental resilience, and the long-term well-being of city dwellers.
References
Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G., & Stone, A. M. (1992). Public space. Cambridge University Press.
Carmona, M. (2010). Contemporary public space: Critique and classification, part one: Critique. Journal of Urban Design, 15(1), 123–148.
Cullen, G. (1996). The concise townscape. Architectural Press. (Original work published 1961)
Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the creative class. Routledge.
Garcia-Ramon, M. D., Ortiz, A., & Prats, M. (2004). Urban planning, gender and the use of public space in a peripheral neighbourhood of Barcelona. Cities, 21(3), 215–223.
Gehl, J. (1987). Life between buildings: Using public space. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Gehl, J. (2001). Life between buildings (5th ed.). Danish Architectural Press.
Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Island Press.
Gehl, J., & Svarre, B. (2013). How to study public life. Island Press.
Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (T. Burger & F. Lawrence, Trans.). MIT Press. (Original work published 1962)
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House.
Kaczynski, A. T., Potwarka, L. R., & Saelens, B. E. (2008). Association of park size, distance, and features with physical activity in neighborhood parks. American Journal of Public Health, 98(8), 1451–1456.
Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. MIT Press.
Madanipour, A. (2003). Public and private spaces of the city. Routledge.
Neils, M. (2010). Rethinking public space. Places Journal. https://placesjournal.org/
Project for Public Spaces. (2008). What makes a great place? Retrieved from https://www.pps.org/article/grplacefeat
Project for Public Spaces. (2018). What is placemaking? Retrieved from https://www.pps.org/article/what-is-placemaking
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.